Skip to main content

Analysis of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury associated with skull base fracture: a local tertiary center experience

Abstract

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major medical and social concern in developing countries. TBI-related morbidity and mortality statistics in Egypt are lacking and do not reflect the actual magnitude of the problem.

Objectives

To overview the incidence of moderate and severe head trauma in a heavily populated developing country and document the outcome of moderate and severe TBI associated with skull base fracture (SBF).

Methodology

Data of patients admitted to our center with moderate and severe TBI associated with skull base fracture (SBF) were reviewed in the period between January 2019 and March 2023.

Results

The most common type of trauma was road traffic accidents in 54.2% of the patients; 91.2% had Single SBF (middle cranial fossa fracture was predominant 58.5%). 25.5% had an initial GCS of ≤ 8. Periorbital ecchymosis was the most common presenting sign in 36.3%. The most frequent complication (37.3%) was pneumocephalus. The presence of skull base fracture inversely affected the Glasgow outcome scale extended GOSE (P = 0.001, r = 0.674). Higher initial GCS scores were positively correlated with good GOSE (GOSE) (P = 0.001, r =− 0.222).

Conclusions

RTA represents a significant cause for moderate and severe TBI in young male population. SBF is associated with poor outcome in moderate and severe TBI. Higher initial GCS score was positively correlated with good GOSE. It is important to have an overview of different types of TBI in Egypt.

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant medical and social issue in modern society. TBI is frequently encountered in emergency rooms, accounting for over one million visits yearly [1]. Road injuries ranked 10th as a leading cause of mortality in lower-middle-income countries according to 2019 WHO Fact sheets [2]. It is the most common cause of mortality among young people (15–29 years) worldwide [1, 3].

In the United States, the annual incidence of TBI is approximately 500 in 100,000. However, around 80% of all TBI cases categorized as mild head injuries [1]. TBI-related morbidity and mortality statistics in Egypt are lacking and do not reflect the actual magnitude of the problem [4, 5]. Skull base fracture (SBF) occurs in 4%–30% of patients admitted with head injuries [6]. It may be caused by direct impact or propagation of high-energy force through the skull. Common causes of skull base fracture are traffic accidents, falls, assaults, and gunshot wounds.

The severity of TBI is routinely assessed, following the initial resuscitation and within 48 h of injury, using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), [7]. Many different clinical signs can predict SBF and its location. Diagnosis is confirmed by different modalities of Computerized tomography (CT) [8].

Moderate and severe TBI are primary causes of injury related morbidity and mortality. There is no various statistical analysis of the RTA related head trauma and its complications in Egypt. Rapid population growth and economic reforms are main reasons for high number RTAs [4, 5].

Egyptian healthcare system carries high burden of treating large numbers of trauma patients despite the limited healthcare professional as well as the medical resources in developing countries [9].

The severity of TBI and its subsequent impact on patient outcomes are complex considerations that demand a comprehensive understanding to enhance treatment strategies and improve functional recovery.

Retrospective analysis of relevant data was conducted in a single tertiary care center. Data of Patients with moderate and severe head injury associated with skull base fracture was collected and analyzed. Our research focuses on presenting the outcome of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in patients with SBF.

Materials and methods

Patient population and study design

This is a single tertiary center retrospective cohort study conducted in the Emergency Hospital, Mansoura University, Egypt. The ethical Committee "local Institutional Review Board at Mansoura medical school" approved the study protocol. Data were handled according to Helsinki Declarations of biomedical ethics [10].

Data were extracted from the emergency hospital medical registry between January 2019 and March 2023. The Picture archiving and communication system (PACS was revised for all patients with clinical evidence of SBF. The in-hospital course, including the initial (GCS) and complications, was reviewed using (Ibn-Sina system) to retrieve relevant data.

The total number of trauma patients is about 236,000 per year. In the study period, we received about 6490 patients with TBI. Data of patients with TBI were collected. The severity of trauma was categorized as mild (GCS 13–15), moderate (GCS 9–13) and severe (GCS 3–8) head injuries. SBFs diagnosed by the presence of clinical signs and radiological evidence. SBFs in mild head trauma, polytraumatized patients and those who underwent surgical intervention excluded from the study.

Inclusion criteria included all patients with moderate and severe TBI associated with SBF in the period between January 2019 and March 2023. Out of a total of 6490 traumatic brain-injured patients, 306 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (21.2% of total TBI). The demographic data (gender, age), mode of injury, clinical presentation including level of consciousness assessed by GCS, periorbital bruises "Raccoon's eye," bruising at the posterior auricular region "battle sign," cerebrospinal fluid from the nose "CSF rhinorrhea" and cerebrospinal fluid from the ears "CSF otorrhea" were gathered and analyzed. The modes of trauma were assault by others (struggle), road traffic accident (RTA), falling to the ground (FTG), falling from height (FFH), falling downstairs (FDS) and direct head trauma (DHT).

The patients with clinical evidence of SBF had High resolution CT scan (HRCT) (1 mm cuts) with axial, coronal, and sagittal reconstructions as a diagnostic tool for detecting SBF and its exact location (anterior, middle, or posterior skull base fossa).

Outcome assessment

Clinical outcome was assessed, using Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOSE), in six months post injury.

Statistical analysis and data interpretation

Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (SPSS Inc., PASW statistics for windows, version 25, Chicago). Qualitative data were represented by numbers and percentages. Quantitative data were represented by the median for nonnormally distributed data after testing normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Results were considered statistically significant if ≤ 0.05. The Chi-Square test used to compare qualitative data between groups as appropriate. Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis test used to compare between two studied groups and more than two studied group–s, respectively, for nonnormally distributed data. Spearman's rank-order correlation determines the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two nonnormally distributed continuous variables and, or ordinal variables.

Results

Three hundred six patients met the inclusion criteria. The demographic data, mode of trauma and types of skull base fractures summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 General characteristics of patients with SBF, clinical presentations & complications of SBF associated with moderate & sever TBI

The male gender (n = 189, 61.8%) was predominant in our patient series. The most common age group affected was 31–40 years (n = 69 patients, 22.5%) and 21–30 years (n = 62 patients, 20.3%). Road traffic accidents were the most common mode of trauma (n = 166 patients, 54.2%) followed by falling from height (n = 75 patients, 24.5%) (Fig. 1). Single skull base fracture was detected in 279 patients (91.2%), most commonly in the middle fossa (n = 180 patients, 58.8%), (Fig. 2). Multiple skull base fractures involving anterior and middle cranial fossa were encountered in 27 patients, (8.8%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of modes of traumatic brain injury

Fig. 2
figure 2

Middle cranial fossa fractures

Two hundred twenty-eight patients (74.5%) had moderate head trauma (GCS 9-13); 78 patients (25.5%) had initial GCS (≤8). The most common presenting sign was periorbital ecchymosis (111 patients, 36.3%) (Fig. 3) followed by CSF otorrhea (95 patients, 31%) (Fig. 4), battle sign (49 patients, 16%) and CSF rhinorrhea (36 patients, 11.8%).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Bilateral periorbital ecchymosis (Raccoon’s eye)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Left ear CSF otorrhea with halo sign

One hundred fifty patients (48.9%) had no complications; while, the most common complication was pneumocephalus (114 patients, 37.3%) followed by meningitis in (33 patients, 10.8%), hydrocephalus in (6 patients, 2.0%), and brain abscess in (3 patients, 1.0%) (Table 1).

Chi-square and Fischer exact tests were used to correlate age and gender with mode of trauma and type of skull base fracture. Male gender and age between 31 and 40 groups, were the most affected among all other groups. Road traffic accident was the most common mode of trauma. MCF fracture was the most common type of SBF (Table 2).

Table 2 Correlation between mode of trauma & type of fracture in SBF patients and age groups

Analysis of RTA group revealed that incidence was higher in male gender (n = 112, P < 0.001), most of them (n = 110, P < 0.001) occurred in moderate head trauma group. Middle (n = 91) and posterior cranial fossa fractures (n = 5) had significant statistical correlation to RTA (P value < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Stratification of SBF patients According to modes of TBI

Single skull base fracture detected in 279 patients (91.2%). 204 patients (73.1%) had initial GCS [9,10,11,12,13]; While 75 patients (26.9%) had initial GCS ≤ 8.

Periorbital ecchymosis (n = 87, 38.2%) and CSF otorrhea (n = 30, 38.5%) was the most common presenting sign in moderate and severe TBI, respectively. Pneumocephalus (n = 114, 37.3%) was the most common complication in both moderate and severe TBI groups (Table 4).

Table 4 Correlation between GCS and Type of skull base fracture & clinical presentation & complications

Periorbital ecchymosis mainly was observed in ACF Fractures. It occurred in combination with Raccoon's eye sign (MCF fractures) in 24/180 patients. None of the PCF patients showed periorbital ecchymosis. Battle sign was observed in radiologically evident MCF fractures more than PCF fractures. Rhinorrhea and otorrhea were observed more in ACF and MCF fractures, respectively (Table 5). A significant correlation (P = 0.008) was found between PCF fractures and pneumocephalus (Table 6).

Table 5 Correlation between incidence of CSF leak (otorrhea & rhinorrhea), signs of skull base fracture (Raccoon eye & battle sign) and type of skull base fracture
Table 6 Correlation between pneumocephalus and type of skull base fracture (anterior & middle and posterior)

Multivariate Spearman correlation used to identify the correlation between initial GCS and Presence of Skull base fracture (single or Multiple) on extended Glasgow outcome scale (GOSE) and revealed statistically significant correlation between them; GOSE was assessed within 6 months post injury. The presence of skull base fracture was inversely correlated with the GOSE (P = 0.001, r = 0.674) (Fig. 5). Higher initial GCS score was directly proportionate with good GOSE (P = 0.001, r = − 0.222) (Fig. 6) (Table 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Correlation between extended Glasgow outcome scale and types of skull base fractures

Fig. 6
figure 6

Correlation between extended Glasgow outcome scale and Glasgow coma scale

Discussion

Moderate and severe TBI are primary causes of injury related morbidity and mortality. There is not enough statistical analysis of the RTA related head trauma and its complications in Egypt. Large population and progressive economic reform strategies are the main reasons for the increase in number of traffic accidents [4, 5].

The incidence of SBF has been reported to occur in 3.5–45.4% of TBI patients. The majority of these data derived from developed countries. It represented 21.2% of TBI patients in our study [11,12,13,14].

Male gender was predominant in our study population matching the results of previous studies [11,12,13,14]. Males usually represent the majority of workforce; therefore, they are more susceptible to accidents and subsequent head trauma more than females.

Similar previous studies showed that young population (21–40 years) were the most affected age group in moderate and severe TBI associated with SBF [14, 15]. Our results showed that the age group (31–40) and (21–30) years were the most commonly affected groups. RTA was the most common mode of trauma. Age group (18–30) years is most commonly affected matching previous reports [14,15,16].

Multi-slice HRCT and other advanced imaging technologies were advocated to detect SBF [8, 17,18,19,20]. In contrast, others have emphasized the significance of clinical signs suggestive of SBF [12, 20, 21]. In our retrospective analysis, HRCT brain was only performed (1 mm thin basal cuts; axial, coronal and sagittal reconstructions) in patients with clinical signs of SBF.

Major neurovascular structures, connecting intracranial and extracranial compartments, pass through skull base. This makes it a dangerous anatomical region for even simple fissure fracture [11, 21, 22]. Our study showed that MCF fractures, detected in 180 patients (58.8%), was the most common type of skull base fractures followed by ACF fractures in 75 patients (24.5%), ACF + MCF fractures in 27 patients (8.8%) then fractures affecting PCF in 24 patients (7.9%). Thinner bone and multiple foramina in MCF, carrying neurovascular bundles, could make it more liable to fractures in comparison with other fossae.

Clinical features of SBF are pathognomonic and include CSF leakage (rhinorrhea, otorrhea), periorbital ecchymosis and postauricular ecchymosis [13, 23, 24]. In our study, periorbital ecchymosis was the most common presenting sign (36.3%) followed by CSF otorrhea, battle sign and CSF rhinorrhea (31%, 16%, 11.8%), respectively.

Post-traumatic CSF leakage (otorrhea and rhinorrhea) is a sign and a complication in the same time. It occurs in 12–30% of all SBF cases and around 2% of all TBI patients [25, 26]. In our study, the prevalence of SBF was 21.2% (306/6490) of all TBI cases; while, CSF leakage was detected in 47.7% (146/306) of SBF patients.

The overall incidence of CSF leakage due to skull base fractures in all TBI patients was 2.24% (146/6490). This requires prompt recognition and early management to guard against meningitis, improve patient outcome, decrease the in-hospital stay and subsequent healthcare burden.

According to the initial GCS presentation, number of patients who had SBF with moderate head trauma was 78 (25.4); while in severe head trauma, the number was 228 (74.6%).There was no statistical correlation (P = 0.073) between the presence or absence of SBF and the severity of head trauma. Single SBF was found in 279 (91.2%); while, multiple SBFs were found in 27 (8.8%) patients. There was no statistically significant correlation between severity of head trauma and number of skull base fractures (P = 0.073). Previously published reports showed no correlation between severe head trauma and number of skull base fractures [11].

No complications were detected in 150 patients (49%). Pneumocephalus (n = 114) was the most common complication (37.3%) followed by meningitis (n = 33, 10.8%). Six patients (1.9%) had hydrocephalic changes in comparison with previously reported incidence of 0.7% [11]. PCF fracture was correlated with higher incidence of pneumocephalus (P = 0.008). This can be explained by the presence of the pneumatized mastoid air cells. MCF fractures were second due to previously mentioned nature of this bone. Published reports showed an increase in the incidence of pneumocephalus by 8% if there is a fracture of the skull base; and 41% increase, if the Sella turcica is involved. Pneumocephalus represented about 1% only of all TBI cases [26,27,28,29].

In our study, CSF leak increased in MCF and ACF fractures, respectively. The predominance of the MCF fractures in our study sample is a possible explanation. The presence of otorrhea in 66 out of 180 MCF fractures and in 95 patients with CSF otorrhea represented a statistically significant link between the CSF leak and the presence MCF fractures followed by ACF fractures, when compared to other types.

There was no correlation between the CSF leak and meningitis. CSF leak mainly was self-limited or low flow, in addition to the early recognition and management. This might explain the absence of significant correlation.

In our study mortality rate (GOSE = 1) was 43 out of 306 patients (14.1%). This goes in line with other reports from data published that showed the mortality rate (14.9%).

Our study carries several limitations. Exclusion of mild head injury might induce a selection bias. Circumstances and management of patients in primary care facilities are not standardized for many reasons. This imposes differences in patients received from surrounding geographical areas. Finally, our study data and results might not be validated in other countries because of the differences in between healthcare systems capability, mode of trauma and patients’ demographics.

Conclusion

Assessing the outcome and presenting the magnitude of the burden of the TBI in Egypt is of paramount importance. RTA represents a significant cause for moderate and severe TBI affecting the young male population who are engaging in outdoor activity and represents the primary workforce for Egypt. Skull base fracture is associated with poor outcome in moderate and sever TBI. Good GOSE is directly correlated with higher initial GCS scores. The study might increase the awareness of the burden of TBI on the healthcare system in a limited resources country.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be available after a reasonable demand.

Abbreviations

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

RTAs:

Road traffic accidents

GCS:

Glasgow coma scale

SBF:

Skull base fracture

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

HRCT:

High resolution CT scan

FTG:

Falling to the ground

FFH:

Falling from height

FDS:

Falling downstairs

DHT:

Direct head trauma

PACS system:

Patients' radiological investigations record

GOSE:

Extended Glasgow outcome scale

ACF:

Anterior cranial fossa

MCF:

Middle cranial fossa

PCF:

Posterior cranial fossa

References

  1. Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung Y-C, Punchak M, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018;130(4):1080–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin L, Liu J, Zhou M. Top 10 causes of death and the most growing causes during the Chinese spring festival holiday - China, 2017–2021. China CDC Wkly. 2023;5(3):68–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ivers R, Brown K, Norton R, Stevenson M. Road traffic injuries. International encyclopedia of public health. Elsevier; 2017. p. 393–400.

  4. Al-Hajj S, Hammoud Z, Colnaric J, Ataya M, Macaron MM, Kadi K, et al. Characterization of traumatic brain injury research in the middle east and north Africa region: a systematic review. Neuroepidemiology. 2021;10:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Montaser T, Hassan A. Epidemiology of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in Cairo University Hospital in 2010. Crit Care. 2013 Apr;17(S2).

  6. Lemole M, Behbahani M. Retrospective study of skull base fracture: a study of incidents, complications, management, and outcome overview from trauma-one-level institute over 5 Years. J Neurol Surg B. 2013;74(S01).

  7. Dewall J. The ABCs of TBI. Evidence-based guidelines for adult traumatic brain injury care. JEMS. 2010;35(4):54–61

  8. Parmar H, Gujar S, Shah G, Mukherji SK. Imaging of the anterior skull base. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2009;19(3):427–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hafez AT, Omar I, Aly M. Challenges to the development of the trauma system in Egypt. J Public Health Africa. 2023;14(5):2214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodyear MDE, Krleza-Jeric K, Lemmens T. The declaration of helsinki. BMJ. 2007;335(7621):624–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Oktavian P, Romdhoni AC, Dewanti L, Fauzi AA. Clinical and radiological study of patients with skull base fracture after head injury. FMI. 2021;57(3):192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yellinek S, Cohen A, Merkin V, Shelef I, Benifla M. Clinical significance of skull base fracture in patients after traumatic brain injury. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;25:111–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wani AA, Ramzan AU, Raina T, Malik NK, Nizami FA, Qayoom A, et al. Skull base fractures: an institutional experience with review of literature. Indian J Neurotrauma. 2013;10(2):120–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sivanandapanicker J, Nagar M, Kutty R, Sunilkumar BS, Peethambaran A, Rajmohan BP, et al. Analysis and clinical importance of skull base fractures in adult patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2018;9(3):370–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Naidu B, Vivek V, Visvanathan K, Shekhar R, Ram S, Ganesh K. A study of clinical presentation and management of base of skull fractures in our tertiary care centre. Interdiscipl Neurosurg. 2021;23: 100906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lafta G, Sbahi H. Factors associated with the severity of traumatic brain injury. Med Pharmacy Rep. 2023;96(1):58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lloyd KM, DelGaudio JM, Hudgins PA. Imaging of skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks in adults. Radiology. 2008;248(3):725–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mendizabal GR, Moreno BC, Flores CC. Cerebrospinal fluid fistula: frequency in head injuries. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1992;113(5):423–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Perheentupa U, Mäkitie AA, Karhu JO, Koivunen P, Blanco Sequieros R, Kinnunen I. Frontobasilar fractures: proposal for image reviewing algorithm. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(4):305–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olabinri EO, Ogbole GI, Adeleye AO, Dairo DM, Malomo AO, Ogunseyinde AO. Comparative analysis of clinical and computed tomography features of basal skull fractures in head injury in southwestern Nigeria. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2015;6(2):139–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Solai CA, Domingues C de A, Nogueira L de S, de Sousa RMC. Clinical signs of basilar skull fracture and their predictive value in diagnosis of this injury. J Trauma Nurs. 2018;25(5):301–6.

  22. Wang H, Zhou Y, Liu J, Ou L, Han J, Xiang L. Traumatic skull fractures in children and adolescents: A retrospective observational study. Injury. 2018;49(2):219–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baugnon KL, Hudgins PA. Skull base fractures and their complications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014;24(3):439–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Faried A, Bachani AM, Sendjaja AN, Hung YW, Arifin MZ. Characteristics of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury of motorcycle crashes in bandung, indonesia. World Neurosurg. 2017;100:195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brodie HA, Thompson TC. Management of complications from 820 temporal bone fractures. Am J Otol. 1997;18(2):188–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewin W. Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in nonmissile head injuries. Clin Neurosurg. 1964;12:237–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pillai P, Sharma R, MacKenzie L, Reilly EF, Beery PR, Papadimos TJ, et al. Traumatic tension pneumocephalus - two cases and comprehensive review of literature. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017;7(1):58–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Aieb A, Peralta R, Ellabib M, El-Menyar A, Al-Thani H. Traumatic tension pneumocephalus: two case reports. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;18(31):145–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eom KS. Clinical and radiological characteristics of traumatic pneumocephalus after traumatic brain injury. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2020;16(1):49–59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

We received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization contributed by MS, AAM, AMN, AAI, AZ, SS, IS, MS.; methodology and data collection contributed by AAM, AMN, AAI.; validation contributed by MS, AAM, AMN, AAI, AZ, SS, IS, MS; data analyses contributed by MS, AAM, AMN, AAI, AZ, SS, IS, MS.; writing–original draft contributed by MS, AAM, AMN, AAI, AZ, SS, IS, MS.; writing, reviewing and editing contributed by IS, MS.; supervision contributed by MS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Serag.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We obtained IRB from mansoura faculty of medicine. Consent to participate from the patients are included.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saad, M., Mowafy, A.A., Naser, A.M. et al. Analysis of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury associated with skull base fracture: a local tertiary center experience. Egypt J Neurosurg 39, 62 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-024-00325-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-024-00325-1

Keywords