Post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak: single-continuous versus double-breasted dural repair of myelomeningocele

Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery

Table 1 Randomization of study participants

Total number of patients (n = 54) serial number	Computer generated random numbers	Grouping Group 1—Single-continuous Group 2—Double-breasted
50	0.681648	GROUP1
23	0.673605	GROUP1
34	0.8203	GROUP2
36	0.931182	GROUP2
27	0.870242	GROUP1
21	0.769891	GROUP2
38	0.397943	GROUP2
17	0.341132	GROUP2
20	0.18704	GROUP1
46	0.64165	GROUP2
3	0.96855	GROUP1
35	0.907612	GROUP2
13	0.374128	GROUP1
40	0.943072	GROUP2
8	0.544075	GROUP2
12	0.869858	GROUP1
14	0.665156	GROUP1
5	0.577816	GROUP2
26	0.575054	GROUP1
29	0.067453	GROUP2
48	0.633643	GROUP2
44	0.554266	GROUP2
4	0.476851	GROUP1
22	0.085918	GROUP2
52	0.034968	GROUP1
6	0.09727	GROUP1
16	0.731923	GROUP1
18	0.262094	GROUP1
32	0.64946	GROUP1
2	0.1814	GROUP1
15	0.496957	GROUP1
10	0.601016	GROUP1
42	0.343562	GROUP2
9	0.081956	GROUP1
47	0.045926	GROUP2
53	0.680607	GROUP1
33	0.896009	GROUP2
7	0.076527	GROUP1
37	0.212344	GROUP2
28	0.888529	GROUP2
45	0.710663	GROUP1
1	0.501163	GROUP1
19	0.021801	GROUP1
39	0.932092	GROUP2
25	0.511502	GROUP2
54	0.932383	GROUP2
31	0.236601	GROUP2
41	0.403465	GROUP1
49	0.553887	GROUP1
24	0.737736	GROUP2
30	0.531601	GROUP2
11	0.463397	GROUP2
51	0.314646	GROUP1
43	0.323104	GROUP2