Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between the improved patients group versus non-improved patients group regarding different assessed parameters

From: Efficacy of neural prolotherapy in treatment of meralgia paresthetica: a case series

Demographic, anthropometric and clinical characteristics; preinjection outcomes measures and procedure assessment

Improved

patients group

(n = 12 lower limbs from 10 patients)||

Non-improved patients group

(n = 7 lower limbs from 5 patients)¶

Test of significance

P

Age (year)†

44.50(43.75 ± 10.69)

39(38.42 ± 9.03)

(Z) − 1.016

0.340

Women‡

7(70)

4(80)

(X2) 0.170

0.680

Weight (kg)†

93.25(90.37 ± 18.20)

78.00(84.78 ± 12.34)

(Z) − 0.931

0.352

Height (cm)†

161(162.25 ± 7.27)

164(164.14 ± 4.18)

(Z) − 0.764

0.445

BMI (kg/m2)†

34.66(34.19 ± 5.76)

31.24 (31.42 ± 3.94)

(Z) − 1.270

0.204

BMI categories

Normal weight‡

1(10)

0(0)

(X2) 2.550

0.466

Overweight‡

1(10)

2(40)

  

Obesity‡

7(70)

3(60)

  

Morbid obesity‡

1(10)

0(0)

  

Side (right/left)§

6/6(50/50)

4/3(57.1/42.9)

(X2) 0.090

0.764

Duration of the symptoms (months)†

12(14.16 ± 9.55)

12(15.00 ± 9.60)

(Z) − 0.043

0.967

Preinjection outcomes measures

Overall MP symptoms (VAS)†

7(7.08 ± 1.37)

7(6.85 ± 1.77)

(Z) − 0.476

0.650

MP pain (VAS)†

5(5.75 ± 1.71)

7(7.57 ± 1.81)

(Z) − 2.261

0.028*

MP paresthesia (VAS)†

7(6.91 ± 1.50)

8(8.00 ± 1.29)

(Z) − 1.637

0.120

MP effect on function and QoL (VAS)†

5(5.50 ± 1.78)

6(5.71 ± 1.60)

(Z) − 0.607

0.592

Procedure assessment

Immediately postinjection MP pain (VAS)†

0(0)

0(0)

(Z) 0.000

1.000

Injection procedure-induced pain (VAS)†

2.75(2.54 ± 0.86)

2(2.28 ± 0.75)

(Z) − 0.709

0.536

Presence of injection procedure side effects§

1(8.3)

0(0)

(X2) 0.616

0.632#

Receiving an extra-injection upon request§

1(8.3)

4(57.1)

(X2) 5.432

0.038*#

Degree of satisfaction regarding the procedure (VAS)†

9.50(9.16 ± 1.02)

4(4.42 ± 2.07)

(Z) − 3.448

 ≤ 0.0001*

  1. kg kilogram; cm, centimeter; BMI body mass index; m meter; MP meralgia paresthetica; VAS visual analogue scale; overall MP symptoms; patient assessment of overall MP symptoms; MP pain; patient assessment of MP pain; MP paresthesia; patient assessment of MP paresthesia; QoL quality of life; MP effect on function and QoL; patient assessment of MP effect on function and QoL; n number of lower limbs
  2. *P is significant at < 0.05
  3. †Data are reported as median (mean ± standard deviation)
  4. ‡Data are reported as number (percentage) of patients
  5. §Data are reported as number (percentage) of lower limbs
  6. ||Bilateral lower limbs with meralgia paresthetica were obtained from two patients (20%) among improved patients group
  7. ¶Bilateral lower limbs with meralgia paresthetica were obtained from two patients (40%) among non-improved patients group
  8. #P value of Fisher's exact test