Gross pathology of brain mass lesions by intraoperative ultrasonography: a comparative study

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) to differentiate the gross pathological features of brain mass lesions in comparison with preoperative imaging and confirmable histopathological results. Results A total of 365 patients were operated on for brain mass lesions removal from May 2017 to May 2022 under the guidance of intraoperative ultrasound with transducers 2.5–8 megahertz (MHZ). Ultrasound gross pathological findings were compared to the preoperative imaging and the confirmable histopathological results. Intraoperative ultrasound defined either internal or external gross pathological features of all brain mass lesions. The IOUS showed spontaneous enhancements of the brain abscess walls, which were equivalent to contrasted CT and MRI. Significantly large diameters were noted in the IOUS measurement of abscesses in comparison with CT and MRI ( P = 0.001). The walls of the brain abscesses were significantly well defined in IOUS imaging in comparison with CT ( P = 0.001) and equivalent to MRI. IOUS showed equivalent significance to CT and MRI in characterizing intra-paren-chymal hematomas. Significantly large diameters were noted in the IOUS measurement of hematomas in comparison with CT and MRI ( P = 0.001). IOUS showed significant definition of brain tumors in comparison with CT and MRI regarding tumor edge definition, tumor contours, necrosis, and cystic components (cystic definition, cystic multiplicity, cystic trabeculations, and cystic wall thickness) ( P = 0.001). IOUS was equivalent to CT and MRI regarding intra-tumoral hematomas and brain edema. IOUS was equivalent to CT regarding calcification detection. The significant criteria for high-grade brain tumors versus low grade by IOUS were: P = 0.001 (necrosis, brain edema, rare calcifications, presence of cystic components, thick cystic walls, large diameter, hypo-echogenicity, and heterogeneity); P = 0.002 (cystic trabeculations); P = 0.005 (multiple cysts); and P = 0.03 (irregular contour). IOUS can characterize brain tumors and suspect specific and significant criteria for many types with great overlap. Conclusions Intraoperative ultrasound has the ability to differentiate the gross pathological features of brain mass lesions in comparison with preoperative imaging and confirmable histopathological results.

solid, cystic, necrotic, and fleshy tissues according to their different acoustic impedances and reflection coefficients [3].Every type of brain tumors has been well imaged by IOUS.Low-grade gliomas are better defined with ultrasound than computed tomography.Abscesses and hematomas are well imaged by IOUS [4].The intraoperative ultrasound had significant agreement with histopathology compared to MRI T1 regarding low-grade gliomas [5].The power of ultrasound signal reflection is determined by tissue components and can indicate the pathology of the lesions.Echogenicity is determined in relation to adjacent brain parenchyma.Hypo-echoic tissues mean elevated water content or elevated cellularity, whereas hyper-echoic tissues mean high stromal components or rich capillaries [6].The ultrasound machine depends on the change in acoustic impendence of the tissues across the wave pathway, while the MRI machine depends on the relative concentration of H nuclei in the different tissues [7].
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the reliability of intraoperative ultrasound for detection of the gross pathological criteria of the brain mass lesions in comparison with preoperative CT, preoperative MRI, and confirmable histopathological results.

Methods
This comparative study was carried out at Zagazig University Hospitals from May 2017 to May 2022 and approved by the institutional review board (Zu-IRB #9654).The study population consisted of 365 patients.
Inclusion criteria were non-traumatic brain mass lesions (tumors, abscesses, and intra-parenchymal hematomas), which indicated for surgical removal.Exclusion criteria were; recurrent brain masses; irradiated brain masses; and traumatic lesions.

Procedures
All patients were operated on under general anesthesia, and consents for the procedure were obtained according to the local research ethics committee in our neurosurgery department.Intraoperative 2D (dimensions) ultrasound was used during surgeries for all patients; IBE-2500D digital ultrasound with endo-cavitary transducer (5, 6.5, and 8 MHZ) of foot diameters 18 × 8 mm and electronic convex transducer (2.5, 3.5, and 5 MHZ) of foot diameters 50 × 12 mm.The deep lesions near the midline of the brain are best delineated by low frequencies (3.5, 5 MHZ), while superficial lesions are best delineated by high frequencies (6.5, 8 MHZ); as is known, the reverse relationship exists between frequency and both depth and resolution clearance (low-frequency waves represent low image resolution but can penetrate deeper because of a low degree of wave attenuation).The probe is inside a sterile surgical sheath with acoustic gel trapped in front of it.The real-time and B-modes were used during the surgical procedure.For best spatial resolution of the brain and the mass lesions, multiple factors must be adjusted during ultrasound imaging: head position (permits saline to stay in the surgical cavity), probe (proper size according to the working area, proper frequency according to the lesion depth), scanner parameters (brightens, depth, gain, focus), and surgical field (air and blood elimination, gel and saline connection, avoid the presence of surgical instruments, and any foreign materials).The ultrasound was used after skull bone removal for delineation of the mass, both internal or external characters in comparison with preoperative images (CT and MRI T1 of 1.5 Tesla) and postoperatively confirmed pathology.The mass lesions were evaluated for external and internal characteristics in B-mode ultrasound by the author, who has experience in ultrasound use during brain surgeries since 2007.The CT and MRI were reported by radiology consultants.

Measurement parameters
• Brain lesion wall definition by IOUS was defined according to Mair et al. [8] grading system, which graded visibility of brain mass lesions and borders by IOUS into 4 grades: grade 0 (not visible), grade 1 (poor visibility and borders), grade 2 (good visibility and poor borders), and grade 3 (good visibility and clear border).During our work, all brain mass lesions were defined as well defined (Mair grade 3) and ill defined (Mair grade 2), as we did not face any grade 1 or 0 according to Mair grading.• Brain tumors grading criteria were done according to the WHO (World Health Organization) grading and classification system [9].Gross criteria evaluated in the three imaging modalities included mass wall, contour, shape, size, color in relation to brain tissues, homogeneity, enhancement, surrounding edema, and internal components including necrosis, hematoma, calcification, and cystic structures.• Intra-parenchymal hematomas aging were classified as acute 2 days, sub-acute 3-14 days, and chronic > 14 days.

Statistical analysis
All data were collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed using IBM Corp.

Results
A total of 365 patients were subjected to the surgical removal of brain mass lesions.Ages ranged from 3 months to 72 years old with a mean of 49 years; males were 235, 64.4% patients, and females were 130 patients with a ratio of 1.8:1.263,72% of the patients were operated for brain tumors, 61 patients were operated for intra-parenchymal hematomas, and 41 patients were operated for brain abscesses.The supra-tentorial location of the mass lesions was found in 274 patients (5% of the patients).Table 1 Brain abscesses The number of patients operated on for brain abscesses was 41, with 53 abscesses (32 patients with a single abscess, six patients with two abscesses, and three patients with three abscesses).The gross pathological features of brain abscesses by IOUS, preoperative CT with contrast, and preoperative MRI with contrast; the multiplicity (single or multiple), shape (round or oval), and brain edema were detected by all of the three imaging modalities without significant differences.The IOUS showed spontaneous enhancements of the brain abscess walls, which were equivalent to contrasted CT and MRI.In all cases, the contents of the brain abscesses were hypo-echogenic in IOUS imaging, hypo-dense in CT imaging, and hypo-intense in MRI T1 imaging in relation to brain tissues.Significantly large diameters were noted in the IOUS measurement in comparison with CT and MRI (P = 0.001).The walls of the brain abscesses were significantly well defined in IOUS imaging in comparison with CT (P = 0.001) and equivalent to MRI.Demonstration of brain abscesses by the three imaging modalities (IOUS, MRI, and CT) and operative specimens of five different cases (a, b, c, d, and e) presented in Fig. 1.

Hematomas
The number of patients operated on for intra-parenchymal hematomas was 61.The gross pathological features of brain hematomas by IOUS, preoperative CT, and Fig. 1 Brain abscesses imaging by MRI with contrast, CT with contrast and IOUS and operative specimens.White arrows point to the wall of the abscesses.Case a: Single brain abscess; enhanced wall, hypo-intense content and surrounded by hypo-intense edema in MRIT1 with contrast.Enhanced wall, hypo-dense content, and surrounded by hypo-dense edema in CT with contrast.Spontaneous enhanced wall, heterogeneous hypo-echoic content and surrounded by hyper-echoic edema in IOUS B-Mod.Thick and smooth wall of the operative specimen.Case b, c differ from (a) in the intraoperative specimen as the wall is thin, smooth, and friable.Case d: Two brain abscesses with same characters as (b, c) but less CT delineation of both abscesses especially the anterior one with time lapse less than 48 h between the three types of imaging modalities.Case e: Three abscesses with similar characters as (a) but rough specimen surface.The noted low resolution of ultrasound image can be explained by the use of low frequency 3 MHZ to reach far depth to delineate all of the lesions, but during resection we used step wise high frequencies 5-8 MHZ for superficial abscesses for better resolution, and then, the deepest one was also better delineated through the resection cavity by high frequencies preoperative MRI T1; the shape (round, oval, or irregular), edge definition, and brain edema were detected by all of the three imaging modalities without significant differences.Color changes with time were defined in the imaging modalities.Significantly large diameters were noted in the IOUS measurement in comparison with CT and MRI (PP = 0.001).Table 3 Demonstration of intra-parenchymal brain hematomas by the three imaging modalities (IOUS, MRI, and CT) in three different cases (a, b, and c) presented in Fig. 2.

Tumors
IOUS showed significant abilities in characterizing brain tumors in 263 patients.

Comparing preoperative (CT, MRI T1) and IOUS tumors characteristics;
• IOUS showed significant definition of brain tumors in comparison with CT regarding tumor edges definition, tumor contours, necrosis, cystic components (cystic definition, cystic multiplicity, cystic trabeculations, and cystic wall thickness), hyper-gray scale, and heterogeneity (P = 0.001).IOUS was equivalent to CT regarding calcification, intra-tumoral hematomas, and brain edema.
• IOUS showed significant definition of brain tumors in comparison with MRI T1 regarding tumor edges, tumor contours, necrosis, calcification, cystic components (cystic definition, cystic multiplicity, cystic trabeculations, and cysts with thin walls), and hyper-gray scale (P = 0.001).IOUS was of significance in the definition of thick walls of cysts and heterogeneity in comparison with MRI (P = 0.016 and 0.03, respectively).IOUS was equivalent to MRI T1 regarding intra-tumoral hematomas and brain edema.• Preoperative MRI T1 showed significant definition of brain tumors in comparison with CT regarding tumor edge delineation, tumor contour definition, necrosis, cystic components, and heterogeneity (P = 0.001).MRI T1 was equivalent to CT regarding intra-tumoral hematomas and brain edema.However, CT significantly defined calcification in comparison with MRI T1 (P = 0.001).Table 4 With these findings, we can find that IOUS gains the benefits of CT in defining calcification and MRI in defining other important pathological features in real-time fashion during surgeries.

IOUS and different tumor types
It is difficult to organize specific criteria for each tumor type (according to the WHO classification of brain tumors) by gross pathological features of any imaging modalities, as brain tumors include a lot of types beside that, the microscopic examination and other investigations like proliferative factors, tumor markers may be needed to reach the real tumor type.IOUS can characterize brain tumors and suspect specific and significant criteria for many types, with overlaps.High-grade criteria by IOUS were applied to differentiate low-grade gliomas from high-grade gliomas and also to other tumor types.

Discussion
The echogenic definitions of the brain mass lesions by intraoperative ultrasound were analyzed and compared to the preoperative imaging and postoperative histopathological data to evaluate reality and characterize different mass lesions pathology by IOUS.In this study, the brain abscess wall appeared hyper-echoic like a ring enhancement with heterogeneous hypo-echoic content and surrounded by hyper-echoic brain edema in all cases.IOUS was significantly superior on CT with contrast in brain abscess wall delineation and equal to MRI T1 with contrast, although no contrast was used with IOUS.Our results were documented in multiple works as Wang et al. [10] described mature abscesses by ultrasound imaging as having heterogeneous hypo-echoic internal contents with a spontaneous contrast-like wall.Chandler and Rubin [4] mentioned that brain abscesses of different dimensions and consistencies were well delineated with IOUS, and the center appears low to high echoic according to the stage of abscess formation.Sosna et al. [11] characterized IOUS imaging of brain abscesses by an obvious hyper-echoic wall and an internal content of variable echogenicity according to its contents of necrosis and debris.Enzmann et al. [12] also described brain abscesses as having iso-to hypo-echogenic content and a hyper-echoic wall by IOUS.Patil et al. [13] described a mature brain abscess as having a regular margin with hypo-echoic contents.Brain abscesses of different sizes and consistency can be well delineated with ultrasound.
According to the stage of the abscess, the center may be of different echogenicity [14].The ultrasound provided more accurate neuropathologic characteristics of the brain abscess than the CT scan [15].
The ultrasound delineated all intra-parenchymal brain hematomas, with characterization of the shape, dimensions, surrounding edema, and age of the blood.The echogenicity varied according to the age of the blood, as acute hematomas up to two days old appeared hyper-echogenic and older hematomas appeared more and more hypo-echogenic.Intra-parenchymal brain hematomas, either acute or sub-acute, are seen as hyperechogenic mass lesions [14].Brain hematomas up to a few days old are imaged as hyper-echogenic mass lesions.After a week to ten days, clot breakdown and red cell destruction tend to make the hematoma appear more and more hypo-echoic [4].Van Velthoven [16]'s study documented different results, as in comparing CT and MRI to IOUS in the evaluation of brain hematomas, he found the borders were not demarcated as in CT and MRI.In other studies, the comparison to preoperative CT brain and MRI showed that IOUS can detect small and large hematomas with great delineation, equivalent to CT and MRI [17][18][19].
In this study; the brain tumors pathological characters were different according to grading and type.IOUS showed great power of delineation of tumor characters more than CT and MRI T1; IOUS showed significant definition of brain tumors more than CT and MRI T1 regarding tumor edges definition, tumor contours, necrosis, cystic components (cystic definition, cystic multiplicity, cystic trabeculations, and cystic wall thickness), hyper-gray scale, and heterogeneity.IOUS was equivalent to CT regarding calcification, intra-tumoral hematomas, and brain edema.IOUS was significantly better than MRI T1 regarding intra-tumoral calcification and equivalent regarding hematoma and edema.The IOUS measures of tumors were found to be larger than CT and MRI but not statistically significant, which may be due to multidirectional measurement compared to CT and MRI, a delay between imaging dates, different tumor cell infiltration detection, or different tissue representation.Regarding the tumor color (gray scale) in CT, MRI, and sonar, the different mechanisms of working between these machines make the tumor components appear different in gray scales.Several studies evaluated the capability of IOUS to detect tumor pathology and characteristics.Panagiota and Pallikarakis [5] detailed that IOUS is even better at delineating the cystic, necrotic, and solid parts than CT.Calcification inside brain tumors produces strong echos, while cysts and necrosis produce weak echos.Chen et al. [20] mentioned that IOUS introduces great details of intracranial lesions as well as or even better than CT and MRI brain.Camp et al. [21] found that IOUS can detect necrosis before detection by CT or MRI of the brain.Leroux et al. [22] and Koivukangas et al. [23] confirmed the ability of ultrasound to distinguish between tumor and edema when CT was equivocal and IOUS was more accurate than CT in the definition of brain glioma.Leroux et al. [22] documented the ability of IOUS to detect infiltrating tumor cells better than T1 MRI and differentiate brain edema as T2 imaging from tumor and normal brain.Chandler and Rubin [4] stated that IOUS can define low-grade gliomas much better than CT, and in cystic brain lesions, IOUS can detect the solid part that does not appear on CT.In high-grade gliomas, the IOUS is better than CT at differentiating cystic parts from necrosis.Low-grade tumors were more echogenic, with well-defined borders.Reinacher and Van Velthoven [24] and Auer and Van Velthoven [17] documented that IOUS can delineate internal characteristics of brain mass lesions better than CT and MRI but is equivocal or less accurate in delineating the border, which is in contrast to our findings.Unsgaard et al. [25] experienced that IOUS were comparable to or even better than MRI regarding landmarks of brain tumors.Moiyadi and Shetty.[26] stated that numerous studies approved better demarcation of brain metastases, malignant tumors, and benign tumors by IOUS than CT and that it was powerful in differentiating solid and cystic lesions.Tumor sizes were different between sonar and MRI.LeRoux et al. [22] demonstrated sonar overestimation but not statistical significance, as our results also [7,24], and [27] documented this observation.Gooding et al. [28] noted that high-density masses by CT are always solid on IOUS, while low-density masses by CT may be either cystic or solid on IOUS, so IOUS is more accurate in cystic lesions definition.Also, Kane [29] stated that many brain lesions that were cystic on CT were solid on IOUS, and cystic brain tumors were extremely well characterized by IOUS, with various trabeculations and solid parts helping complete tumor resection.Koivukangas [30] found a difference between CT density and sonar echogenicity without any relation.Ferrigno and Foroni [31] reported that MRI T1 and sonar images are equivalent in terms of gray scale, as both can show soft tissues well, delineate the periphery in high gray, and show cystic and necrotic parts in low gray scales, so both are similar and comparable.
The grading criteria of brain tumors (high versus low grades) can be evaluated by IOUS with significant correlation to the WHO grading system.Tumors of large sizes increase the diagnosis toward high grading.The criteria for high grading increase with the irregularity of the edges and the heterogeneity of the tumor.Low-grades tumors showing a high echogenicity with a better border delineation [32].Rogers et al. [33] described benign tumors according to the well-margin definition by IOUS.Chacko et al. [34] found that all tumors were hyperechoic on IOUS irrespective of pathology, which was not matched with our results.Brain tumors types can be specified by IOUS in certain situations, as gross pathology specification of tumors types is not supported by any imaging and requires extensive histopathological examinations.Patil et al. [13] described meningiomas on IOUS as having 100% welldelineated borders, 95% homogenous mass, 93% hyperechogenicity, and being surrounded by brain edema in 449% of cases.Ang et al. [35] described meningiomas in IOUS as hyper-echogenic.Meningiomas are the most hyper-echogenic brain mass lesion, especially if calcifications are present [5].Chen et al. [18] demonstrated pathological characteristics of brain mass lesion by IOUS: meningiomas were mostly heterogeneous and hyperechogenic masses; low-grade gliomas were iso-echogenic or hyper-echogenic masses; high-grade gliomas and metastases were hypo-echogenic to hyper-echogenic masses.Van Velthoven [16]'s work on 374 cases of IOUS  This study provided a collection of different brain pathologies imaged by conventional ultrasound to encourage the use of this valuable aid during brain surgeries.Beside pathological definition, the IOUS can also define brain anatomical landmarks and assist in safe gross total resection; these were documented recently by Dixon et al. [40] and Frassanito et al. [41] with recommendation to make IOUS as a routine neurosurgical tool and encourage the training by spending some time performing pre-IOUS to scan the surgical field on planes comparable to preoperative MRI to maintain a correct orientation of the anatomical and pathological situation.
Multiple advances of intraoperative ultrasounds in recent years as 3D, contrast enhancing, and navigator coupling provided more surgical orientation and this field still of need for more innovations [42].

Conclusion
The intraoperative ultrasound during brain surgeries has a role in defining the internal and external gross pathological features of all non-traumatic mass lesions.The walls of the brain abscesses were significantly well defined in IOUS imaging in comparison with CT and equivalent to MRI.IOUS showed equivalent significance to CT and MRI in characterizing intra-parenchymal brain hematomas.IOUS showed significant definition of brain tumors in comparison with CT and MRI regarding tumor edges, contours, necrosis, and cystic components.The significant criteria for high-grade brain tumors by IOUS were the presence of necrosis, brain edema, cystic components with thick walls and trabeculations, large diameter, hypoechogenicity, heterogeneity, and irregular contour.Well-defined fleshy mass with hyper-echogenic periphery and hypo-echogenic center in IOUS.The ultrasound criteria of low-grades tumors as noted in case a are regular contours, hyper-echogenicity, homogeneity, and few amount of brain edema.The ultrasound criteria of high-grades tumors as noted in case b are irregular contours, necrosis, brain edema, hypo-echogenicity, and heterogeneity

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Imaging of intracerebral hematomas by CT, MRI, and IOUS.Arrows 1 refer to the hematoma and arrows 2 refer to brain edema.Case a: Acute intracerebral hematoma; homogenous hyper-dense in CT on day 1, homogenous hypo-intense in MRI T1 on day 1 and heterogeneous mostly hyper-echogenic in IOUS on day 2. Case b: Early sub-acute intracerebral hematoma; hyper-dense mostly homogenous in CT on day 5, heterogeneous hypo-intense in MRI T1 with contrast on day 6 and heterogeneous mostly hyper-echogenic in IOUS on day 7. Case c: Intracerebral hematoma; hyper-dense mostly homogenous in CT on day 5, homogenous hyper-intense in MRI on day 15 (late sub-acute) and homogeneous iso-echogenic in IOUS on day 15.Case d: Intracerebral hematoma; heterogeneous mixed densities in CT on day 10, homogenous hypo-intense in MRI on day 60 and heterogeneous hypo-echogenic in IOUS on day 60

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Imaging of high-grades glioma by MRI with contrast, CT with contrast and IOUS.Cases a, b, c astrocytoma grade 3; arrows 1 refer to cystic part and arrows 2 refer to fleshy part with heterogeneous enhancement in MRI, faintly enhanced CT in case b, IOUS delineated well the fleshy part (hyper-echogenic) and the cystic parts (hypo-echogenic) and low edema in all images.Cases d, e, f; astrocytoma grade 4. Case d; arrows 3 refer to cystic part and arrows 4 refer to fleshy part which more delineated in IOUS image.Case e; arrows 3 refer to content of the lesion which appeared cystic in MRI and CT images but fleshy in IOUS image (mixed echogenicity) which matched intraoperative findings.Arrows 4 refer to mass boundaries which delineated well in all images.Case f; arrows 3 refer to content of the lesion which appeared fleshy with necrosis in all images but small cysts appeared in IOUS image and arrows 4 refer to mass boundaries which less delineated in CT image.The ultrasound criteria of high-grades tumors as noted in these cases are irregular contours (a, b), necrosis (e, f), brain edema(all), presence of cystic component, cystic multiplicity, cystic trabeculations, thick cystic walls (all except e), hypo-echogenicity (b, e, f), and heterogeneity (See figure on next page.)

Fig. 5
Fig.5 Graph demonstrating the brain tumors grading; high grade (HG) versus low grade (LG) according to IOUS imaging

Fig. 6
Fig.6 Imaging of brain metastases by CT with contrast, MRI with contrast and IOUS.Arrows 1 refer to the fleshy tumor and arrows 2 refer to brain edema.Case a: Well-defined fleshy mass with heterogeneous enhancement and central necrosis in CT and MRI.Well-defined fleshy mass with hyper-echogenic periphery and hypo-echogenic center in IOUS.Case b: Ill-defined mass with heterogeneous enhancement in CT and well defined with homogenous enhancement in MRI.Well-defined fleshy mass mostly hypo-echogenic in IOUS.Case c: Ill-defined mass with heterogeneous enhancement in CT and well defined with heterogeneous enhancement in MRI.Well-defined fleshy mass with heterogeneous hyper-echogenicity in IOUS.The ultrasound criteria of high-grades tumors as noted in these cases are irregular contours, necrosis, brain edema, hypo-echogenicity, and heterogeneity

Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Imaging of meningioma by CT with contrast, MRI with contrast and IOUS.Arrows 1 refer to the fleshy tumor and arrows 2 refer to brain edema.Case a: Ill-defined mass without enhancement in CT and well defined with homogenous enhancement in MRI.Well-defined fleshy mass with homogenous hyper-echogenicity in IOUS.Case b: Well-defined fleshy mass with heterogeneous enhancement and necrosis in CT and MRI.Well-defined fleshy mass with hyper-echogenic periphery and hypo-echogenic center in IOUS.The ultrasound criteria of low-grades tumors as noted in case a are regular contours, hyper-echogenicity, homogeneity, and few amount of brain edema.The ultrasound criteria of high-grades tumors as noted in case b are irregular contours, necrosis, brain edema, hypo-echogenicity, and heterogeneity

Table 2 Table 1
Patients and brain mass lesions data

Table 4
Brain tumors gross pathology according to CT, MRI, and IOUS investigation *P < 0.05 significant IOUS (intraoperative ultrasound), CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) Brain tumors grading; high grade (HG) versus low grade (LG) according to CT, MRI T1, and IOUS investigation c: White arrows refer to calcifications (hyper-dense in CT and hyper-echogenic in IOUS).Case d: Pilocytic astrocytoma; arrows 1 refer to large cystic part, arrows 2 refer to small fleshy part with best delineation in IOUS images.Cases e, f: Astrocytoma grade 2; arrows 3 refer to the fleshy lesion which appeared hypo-intense in MRI T1, hypo-dense in CT and hyper-echogenic with best delineation in IOUS.The ultrasound criteria of low-grades tumors as noted in these cases are calcifications a, b, c, regular contours, hyper-echogenicity, homogeneity, single cyst (d), and few amount of brain edema Elmesallamy Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery (2024) 39:24 Fig.3(See legend on previous page.)

Table 6
IOUS criteria of tumors types