Skip to main content

Table 1 Neurosurgery related-evaluated websites

From: Info-pollution: a word of caution for the neurosurgical community

Tool

Subject

Findings

Author

DISCERN

Vestibular schwanoma

Highly variable in quality

Information written at a difficult level

[18]

DISCERN and Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool

Pituitary adenoma

Highly variable in quality

Correlation between different assessors was poor different in how healthcare professionals and patients view healthcare information

[19]

DISCERN

Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Highly variable in quality-Fair to border line quality

[20]

DISCERN

Craniosynostosis

Top quality information available but not appearing of an internet search

[32]

DISCERN, accessibility and comprehensibility

Cervical spine surgery

Mostly low quality

High quality were affiliated with a professional society

[56]

DISCERN

Pediatric neuro-oncology

Web sites were found deficient in topics covering etiology, late effects, prognosis, and treatment choices

[4]

DISCERN

Pediatric neuro-oncology

Most sites rated from poor to very poor

Difficult readability

[65]

DISCERN

Pediatric neuro-oncology

Time-consuming

Few French speaking website

[64]

DISCERN, JAMA Benchmark, Discectomy-specific content score

Discectomy

Poor and variable

20–30% good quality compared to 2005

[78]

DISCERN, JAMA Benchmark, Discectomy-specific content score

Scoliosis

Significant differences noted between the DISCERN score, JAMA benchmark criteria, and scoliosis-specific content quality score

[85]

HON code

Low back pain

Average quality was satisfactory

[99]

Rating as “excellent,” “high,” “moderate,” “low,” or “unacceptable”

Vertebroplasty

Inadequate information

Misleading information

HON code could not be used

[100]