Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between the preinjection and the postinjection assessments regarding outcomes measures and procedure assessment

From: Efficacy of neural prolotherapy in treatment of meralgia paresthetica: a case series

Outcomes measures

Preinjection assessment

(n = 19 lower limbs from 15 patients)§

Postinjection assessment

(n = 19 lower limbs from 15 patients)§

Test of significance||

P

Overall MP symptoms (VAS)†

7(7.00 ± 1.49)

1(1.84 ± 1.80)

-3.848

≤ 0.0001*

MP pain (VAS)†

6(6.42 ± 1.92)

1(1.94 ± 1.87)

-3.745

 ≤ 0.0001*

MP paresthesia (VAS)†

7(7.31 ± 1.49)

1(1.89 ± 2.13)

-3.835

 ≤ 0.0001*

MP effect on function and QoL (VAS)†

5(5.57 ± 1.67)

0(1.05 ± 1.47)

-3.839

 ≤ 0.0001*

Procedure assessment

Immediately postinjection MP pain (VAS)†

0(0)

NA

NA

NA

Injection procedure-induced pain (VAS)†

2.5(2.44 ± 0.81)

NA

NA

NA

Presence of injection procedure side effects‡

NA

1(5.3)

NA

NA

Degree of satisfaction regarding the procedure (VAS)†

NA

8(7.42 ± 2.75)

NA

NA

  1. MP meralgia paresthetica; VAS visual analogue scale; overall MP symptoms; patient assessment of overall MP symptoms; MP pain; patient assessment of MP pain; MP paresthesia; patient assessment of MP paresthesia; QoL quality of life; MP effect on function and QoL; patient assessment of MP effect on function and QoL; n number of lower limbs; NA not applicable
  2. *P is significant at < 0.05
  3. †Data are reported as median (mean ± standard deviation)
  4. ‡Data are reported as number (percentage) of lower limbs
  5. §There were four patients with bilateral meralgia paresthetica
  6. ||Value of Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test