Skip to main content

Table 4 Relation between pre, postoperative variables and the need for revision surgery among studied groups:

From: Posterior and postero-lateral incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery: primary repair versus augmented primary repair

 

Revision surgery

χ2

P

No (n = 62)

Yes (n = 6)

Gender

    

Female

21 (33.9%)

4 (66.7%)

  

Male

41 (66.1%)

2 (33.3%)

Fisher

0.183

Age

    

Mean ± SD

48.98 ± 8.55

43.67 ± 9.87

t (1.437)

0.155

BMI

    

Mean ± SD

27.36 ± 2.54

25.67 ± 2.84

t (1.546)

0.127

Co morbidity

    

NAD

26 (41.9%)

2 (33.3%)

  

Smoker

19 (30.7%)

0 (0%)

  

Diabetes

17 (27.4%)

4 (66.7%)

4.666

0.097

ASA:

    

Mean ± SD

2.39 ± 0.51

2.67 ± 1.03

t (−0.648)

0.544

Previous surgery

    

No

42 (67.7%)

6 (100%)

  

Yes

20 (32.3%)

0 (0%)

Fisher

0.169

No of operated levels

    

Mean ± SD

2.23 ± 1.03

1.33 ± 0.52

t (3.592)

0.005*

Extent of dural tear

    

0–2 cm

36 (58.1%)

6 (100%)

  

 > 2 cm

26 (41.9%)

0 (0%)

Fisher

0.075

Post-op immobilization

    

Mean ± SD

1.51 ± 0.47

1.33 ± 0.26

0.901

0.371

Clinical outcome

    

Better

62 (100%)

0 (0%)

  

Worse

0 (0%)

6 (100%)

Fisher

 < 0.001*

Length of hospital stay (days)

    

Mean ± SD

6.53 ± 1.28

31.67 ± 1.03

−46.66

 < 0.001**

Days of drains

    

Mean ± SD

4.32 ± 0.65

6.33 ± 1.03

−4.681

0.004*

Days of bed rest

    

Mean ± SD

4.48 ± 0.87

8.33 ± 1.16

−10.309

 < 0.001**

Complications

    

No

56 (90.3%)

6 (100%)

  

CSF leakage

6 (9.7%)

0 (0%)

Fisher

 > 0.999

  1. **P ≤ 0.001 is statistically highly significant