Skip to main content

Table 3 Primary and secondary outcome of the studied groups

From: Posterior and postero-lateral incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery: primary repair versus augmented primary repair

 

Primary repair Group (A)

Augmented repair Group (B)

χ2

P

N = 34

N = 34

  

Clinical outcome

Better

32 (94.1%)

30 (88.2%)

  

Worse

2 (5.9%)

4 (11.8%)

Fisher

0.673

Length of hospital stay (days)

Mean ± SD

7.94 ± 6.46

9.56 ± 8.05

Z (-2.173)

0.03*

Days of drains

Mean ± SD

4.38 ± 0.49

4.62 ± 1.16

t (1.092)

0.281

Days of bed rest

Mean ± SD

4.5 ± 0.79

5.12 ± 1.79

t (1.843)

0.072

Revision surgery

No

32 (94.1%)

30 (88.2%)

  

Yes

2 (5.9%)

4 (11.8%)

Fisher

0.673

Further management

Blood patch

4 (13.6%)

3 (8.8%)

Fisher

0.476

Complications

No

29 (85.3%)

27 (91.2%)

  

CSF leakage

5 (14.7%)

3 (8.8%)

Fisher

0.709

  1. *T independent sample t-test p < 0.05 is statistically significant